Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ethics in photography
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:59:55 +0200
References: <4a3a3531-2a67-cd64-2708-b0caf08757e9@cox.net>

No. You tried at the cash register, that is enough. Staples is not a little 
mom-and-pop store. If they screwed up their IT, good for you.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 15 Aug 2016, at 02:42, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> 
> Here is today's question.  I am out of photo mailers, so I go to Staples 
> to get some more.  I don't use them that often, so bought a pack of 11x14 
> for $7.99.  At checkout, the cashier says that will be 54 cents.  I say, 
> that can't be right unless there is some really extreme sale.  The cashier 
> says it is, that is how it scans.  Now the price is preposterous on its 
> face, since I'm sure there is nothing in the store that sells for 54 
> cents.  So, the question is, should I have brought it to a manager's 
> attention instead of buying out the remaining store stock?
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Ethics in photography)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Ethics in photography)