Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] I think it can not be fixed
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:20:47 -0700
References: <AE7C3A05-F7FF-4264-BA4F-4DF51DD04658@gmail.com> <6C829736-3460-4D2A-871F-9FDAA9D1D0E1@frozenlight.eu> <E4D49B3B-4796-4645-A090-347D6729A845@gmail.com> <BA20AE8F-9745-4EA0-86CD-F00A0F1D8238@gmail.com> <6CF06C9C-FEEC-45D4-A4DD-BF366B1F0E34@frozenlight.eu>

> On Jul 31, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am not Lluis, Steve, and I am no expert but I have recently gone back to 
> film for, say, 10-15% of my shooting. Why? Because it has some ?je ne sais 
> quoi? to it?tonality, magic, whatever.

Agree Nathan, but maybe the experience is entirely, "in the brain".
I suspect if we put up 50 digital images; and 50 film images and  tested our 
ability to tell the difference, we would be right, probably as much as  50 
percent of the time.


Steve


> And there is a distinct pleasure in shooting my Leica M2 with period 
> lenses like the 50mm Summilux from the 1960s or the 90mm Tele-Elmarit that 
> still deliver such superb images. It may not be wholly rational, but 
> nobody is paying me to take pictures?I have a good day job which provides 
> me with a decent living?so I can take pictures in whatever way pleases me. 
> 
> I am going to spend a day with Lluis in his summer home, Sitges, about 30 
> km south of Barcelona. The plan is to walk around with him, and hopefully 
> use his invisibilty cloak and his charm to get some decent shots of my 
> own. I plan to shoot mainly film?I will take a digital camera with me to 
> supplement the M2, but most likely it will be just the Ricoh GR or perhaps 
> the Fuji X-T1 with just one lens, the tiny but superb 27mm.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 31 Jul 2016, at 18:07, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Lluis, a question to run by you, now an expert, if this same image has 
>> been shot digitally, would you have had more power to fix it, the way you 
>> would like?
>> 
>> many thanks,
>> 
>> amities,
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 8:56 AM, lluisripollphotography 
>>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you Nathan, I forget it, as you say I have other images to work
>>> 
>>> Un abrazo
>>> Lluis
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> El 30 jul 2016, a les 7:15, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> va 
>>>> escriure:
>>>> 
>>>> Lluis, I am sure you can do something using Photoshop heroics and other 
>>>> voodoo but given how many great images you have in your files, it just 
>>>> does not seem worth the effort.
>>>> 
>>>> Un abrazo,
>>>> Nathan
>>>> 
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>> YNWA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 30 Jul 2016, at 02:30, lluisripollphotography 
>>>>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please take a look to this picture from 1992 (please view large), I 
>>>>> like very much the expression and the moment but the picture is bad, 
>>>>> beside the negative is dirty and I would have to clean, the picture is 
>>>>> undefined, out of focus, I think I can?t anything to improve it? any 
>>>>> idea?
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Vintage/Vilanova_Vintage/199202007LR5.jpg.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
>>>>> Lluis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)