Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was for research, Lluis. ;-) Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 6/16/2016 7:39 AM, lluisripollphotography wrote: > I agree Jim, but I think is too much a 100% crop > > Lluis > > >> El 16 juny 2016, a les 4:23, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> va >> escriure: >> >> I looked through the images I made with the Steinheil Munchen Culminar >> 85/2.8 lens, made in 1950, to see if I could find a clear one to >> evaluate. This small image of a Blue Jay in open shade was cropped from >> the 100% image and was not resized. It represents less than 7% of the >> area of the original image. I did go through my normal post processing >> routine, including Focus Magic and Neat Image. >> >> Considering the difficulty I had in manually focusing at f/4 in the >> shade, I was favorably impressed by the lens. Made with a Leica LTM >> adapter on the Fuji X-E1. >> >> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/7+Per+Cent+Crop+of+100+Per+Cent+Image+from+Steinheil+Culminar+85mm+Lens.tif.html >> >> Comments and critiques welcomed and appreciated. >> >> -- >> Jim Nichols >> Tullahoma, TN USA >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >