Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] KONOST CAMERA
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:24:55 -0500
References: <155202A6-87C9-4889-A9F7-6576D187FA44@gmail.com> <88672054-6E52-4B14-B01D-BA3C7CD427A1@icloud.com> <F6CAC090-51F0-4699-8BBD-C6AD571B870D@gmail.com> <F87EDDE7-1974-4F3D-9E4E-E9F58FD41714@icloud.com>

You make some very good points, Gerry.  Thanks for sharing them.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 4/5/2016 9:08 AM, Gerry Walden wrote:
> Lluis, Ted and others,
>
> As you know I have now moved back to Leica with an M9 and M7, more of 
> which I will come to.
>
> To me the Konost offers very little (if anything) which is not covered by 
> the Fuji X-Pro cameras, especially now that the X-Pro2 is available. The 
> only plus point is that it is full frame, but it has the disadvantage of 
> needing pretty expensive lenses whether you go down the Leica route or 
> some other that makes M-mount lenses. This point in my opinion is going to 
> rule it out for virtually all buyers.
>
> The main point is that IT IS NOT A LEICA, and it never will be. there is 
> something very special about using Leica equipment and why I have moved 
> back to it. Don?t get me wrong, the X-Pro series is a damned good series 
> with excellent lenses, and the Konost may be damned good too. All I know 
> is that when I shot with Fuji about half of my submissions to Alamy 
> failed, and none have failed since switching to Leica. Also with Fuji I 
> had to accept an optical viewfinder with frame lines which had no sense of 
> reality. I had to use different settings with Lightroom than any other 
> camera I have ever used. And to top it all my resale value plummeted like 
> a stone.
>
> The Konost may well suffer from all of the above, but even if it doesn?t 
> it will never have that certain something which says LEICA!
>
> Gerry
>
>> On 5 Apr 2016, at 01:23, lluisripollphotography <lluisripollphotography 
>> at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gerry,
>>
>> It looks it will be a camera working like a Leica, the rumors say that 
>> prices could be under 50% of Leica, this camera has an advanced feature, 
>> the viewfinder is optical but the rangefinder and parallax correction are 
>> digital, I suppose this will give more precision and framing than the 
>> usual viewfinders on Leica based on the technologies from the 50?s.
>>
>> Wait and see?
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> El 4 abr 2016, a les 20:43, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at icloud.com> va 
>>> escriure:
>>>
>>> Lluis
>>>
>>> One simple question - would you use one?
>>>
>>> Gerry
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4 Apr 2016, at 16:40, lluisripollphotography <lluisripollphotography 
>>>> at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This looks very interesting and could be a serious concurrence for Leica
>>>>
>>>> <http://konost.com>
>>>>
>>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>> Lluis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] KONOST CAMERA)
Message from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] KONOST CAMERA)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] KONOST CAMERA)
Message from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] KONOST CAMERA)