Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:44:58 -0800
References: <C60E7F45-64DE-49A7-BD1B-12AD6E0F13D8@fastmail.com> <CAH1UNJ2FPy9u23yzkwpKS7EXV998AjZR7HnekJe_aRi8SARneQ@mail.gmail.com>


Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:16 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Adam,
> TFS. Looks tempting! I wonder how it stacks up with similar offerings fron
> Sony & Fuji. I have been using a Fuji X100S for some time now, and I find
> it very useful. A full frame might be nicer, though the Sony's 35mm lens
> might just be more versatile. Unfortunately, there is no way to try out the
> Leica as they have no dealers here - it will have to wait till I travel
> nextt time.
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
We love ours!


> 
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Adam Bridge <abridge683 at fastmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> This review is getting lots of play over on the techie side:
>> 
>> <http://craigmod.com/sputnik/leica_q/>
>> 
>> If this has been posted already my apologies, the volume on the LUG
>> sometimes overwhelms me and a week will go by without even skimming it.
>> 
>> Sigh.
>> 
>> Enjoy,
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q)
In reply to: Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] LINK: interesting review (long term) of Leica Q)