Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No On 1/31/16 1:56 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > Leica users group, LUG, what does that mean? Several individuals > have confided to me recently, "it?s really a state of mind?. Let?s > face it, there are few offerings of interest from Leica these days, > that we can afford, or desire to, while more and more we all find > great offerings from many other camera and lens makers. We all insist > we are leica devotees, yet many of us, if not most, are using other > makers' cameras and lenses. We often find that leica lenses from the > past, actually work as well on other makers current camera bodies, > sometimes better than on leica?s own bodies. We publish a wonderful > yearly book of photos, that we call the LUG yearbook, yet insist that > the photos can come from any and all camera/lens sources, and images > do originate from many other sources. We criticize robustly, even > occasionally correctly, the offerings from Leica, their appearance, > technical details, prices, yet we remain here and claim to be Leica > users. So what is it that we have in common, that keeps here in this > group, why do we self identify as Leica users ? > > There are some truly great photographers here, not because they use > leicas, other reasons may exist. We really are a community, sometimes > even a family, occasionally very dysfunctional. Some of the most > opinionated among us use leicas, or used to, or desire to, even > though at present that use is limited, or nonexistent. > > We are at present, among the most capable, open minded, flexible, > sure of ourselves, opinionated, fractious, difficult, stuck up > shooters that exist. > > It may be time to talk. > > > steve > > > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >