Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Yearbook 2015 aftermath
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:38:19 -0800
References: <21423297.1453091179254.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

> On Jan 17, 2016, at 8:26 PM, Montie <montoid at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Concur completely. 
> 
> Montie
> 
> 
>>> Richard--as a journalist of more than half a century, I must say that no 
> effort in print ever is accepted by 100 percent of the readers. 
>   I believe your outstanding effort has the approval of a majority of 
> those 
> who participated. That a few have disagreed is regretful but hardly an 
> excuse to abandon the project. To have expected total approval from synch 
> a 
> collection of creative souls was foolish. 
>   You did an admirable and professional job. If you are certain in your 
> decision then you go with my strongest approval and my sincere regret. 
>   I, for one, hope you will take time to reconsider. 
> 
> Bill Clough

I agree,

so sorry, a great job.

Consider please do it again.

steve
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] LUG Yearbook 2015 aftermath)