Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, Thanks for those links. The David Farkas article in particular compares the 246 to the 240 converted to B&W. He finds the 240 provides B&W results that are close to the 246 at low ISO?s and only starts to fall behind the 246 at the highest ISO?s. That is just what I was looking for, and it makes me think that I will get a 240. Robert > On Jan 17, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> > wrote: > > Amazing how many articles a Google search will find.... > > http://tinyurl.com/hn3kqo4 Bottom of the page lists several..... > > > From Erwin....., who has 3 different articles..... > > http://www.imx.nl/photo/leica/camera/styled-11/ > > I think the issue is how much computer work do you LIKE to do? Vs. Your > wallet....... > > Ask someone that has both to send you the SAME photograph from each > camera... One in color ( M240) and the other in B+W (M246) and play with > it yourself in LR,PS, or whatever you like to use......... > > If you get 2 differing subject images, you have no way to see if your > skills at Post are up to the differences in the cameras' hardware.... > > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > >> >> I wasn?t asking for comparisons of the two Monochroms, but a comparison >> of the current Monochrom with the 246 (which the Monochrom is based on) >> converted to B&W. >> >> I?m wondering if I could get along with the 246 and converting to B&W >> when I want B&W, but have color otherwise, and not lose quality in >> comparison with the Monochrom. >> >> Robert > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information