Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That?s what I was wondering about, but I wonder if anyone has done any actual comparisoon shots. > On Jan 17, 2016, at 10:38 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > > You are unlikely to get the same tonal range from a converted colour shot, > also nothing like the same quality at +2500ISO. I 'only' have the original > Monochrom so cannot comment more... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Meier > > Sorry, that's what I meant: 240 vs. 246 in B&W. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 17, 2016, at 10:10 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: >> >> The 246 is the new Monochrom ;-) It is the 240 that has more colours.... >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> I wasn?t asking for comparisons of the two Monochroms, but a comparison >> of the current Monochrom with the 246 (which the Monochrom is based on) >> converted to B&W. >> >> I?m wondering if I could get along with the 246 and converting to B&W >> when I want B&W, but have color otherwise, and not lose quality in >> comparison with the Monochrom. >> >> Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information