Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with Frank, CC is the only way to go. I cannot understand the mindset prevalent on this forum that is suspicious of CC, but freely uses DNG on their Leica digital output. Which is more worrying? Think about it!! Cheers Jayanand On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > I won't comment on why V6 is better than V5,,,, but I will tell you that > Adobe has said that unless you use CC, you will miss out on some of the > improvements they are planning.... > > IOW, if you don't change to LRCC, we are going to toss you fewer bones, and > ... and this is speculation.... make you suffer until you do...... at > which point we gotcha...... because we are going to discontinue the stand > alone application.... > > My $0.02? Change over the LRCC, now. Within a year or so, you will have > to > anyway..... There is a first year coupon for $89 for the year...... > Takes > away some of the bite..... > > Adobe has never gotten over the fact that fonts became universally > cheap....... They are still trying to get even....... > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > > I have been using LR5, the most recent in a long chain of upgrades to LR. > > What advantages or disadvantages does LR6 offer ? > > Thanks for comments from experienced users, > > Oliver > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information