Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2015/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] SL Review
From: john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:59:38 +0100
References: <15519040.1447860923487.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <3FC7B66D-E0C0-4836-AA90-412E277E6DBC@icloud.com> <CA+yJO1DmzZMH-6Fq3v7fOu4AkNK4RUSE2AJwRCjdO2Ev3sqGWA@mail.gmail.com> <B01D530B-94F6-4F52-9021-84A5DA0B1D3B@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1Bi5ze-UpCvcgRWYrgG8HSKsvq_MZ3OdYrxjJssetWe=A@mail.gmail.com> <D468CE53-3750-476E-94D3-B3C2B4691D96@gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh6VBwyWNOx4wEtogf1JES5AzK0KJ5XdPkciwSK4CHTLbg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAsXt4O35skf4bpjF9F1_zY90zZ=d--nPqCfHDWWUqmfBwXG9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-HWV4UXWKJAj43F3-=6XVS=et+1cM=QQwX_prK3-ckF1Q@mail.gmail.com>
It has decent video specs, will (eventually) take S lenses and is thought to
possibly maybe have an outside chance of being a forerunner to a camera to
be used on a Sinar like view camera.....
john,
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Man
Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M lens.
For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines separate
In reply to:
Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] off list Re: SL Review)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] SL Review)