Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] SL Review
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:15:02 -0800
References: <15519040.1447860923487.JavaMail.root@elwamui-cypress.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <3FC7B66D-E0C0-4836-AA90-412E277E6DBC@icloud.com> <CA+yJO1DmzZMH-6Fq3v7fOu4AkNK4RUSE2AJwRCjdO2Ev3sqGWA@mail.gmail.com> <B01D530B-94F6-4F52-9021-84A5DA0B1D3B@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1Bi5ze-UpCvcgRWYrgG8HSKsvq_MZ3OdYrxjJssetWe=A@mail.gmail.com> <D468CE53-3750-476E-94D3-B3C2B4691D96@gmail.com>

I'm curious how the wides will perform relative to the M240.  If there is a
difference, I suspect it might be due to Leica using a different filter
over the sensor.  I would not be surprised of the M9 glass issue was
related to it being thinner than all the others use.  There now seems to be
a replacement glass that is more durable.  I would like to see a comparison
test of an M9 before and after the glass change.  When I get my M9 back
from Leica I'll see if I can do that.

I think the filter over the sensor/obtuse light angle problem has not yet
been totally solved.  Combine the possibility of changes on this front with
the apparent practice of some lens makers to design the lens to offset the
sensor cover stack effects, and it just might put a variable into the
formula that makes investment in an expensive lens set less attractive.

Getting rid of that filter has now replaced my previous desire to get rid
of the mirror in SLRs.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Bravo, enjoy it Tina,  tell us, I know you will !
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Mine is being shipped to the dealer today and should be here this week or
> > early next week.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> But equally important is to weed out the corporate shills. Anybody who
> has
> >> a prototype from Leica is an insider in my view, and I certainly take
> such
> >> a person?s reviews with a big grain of salt. The most trustworthy
> reviews
> >> are by people who buy the equipment like you and I would have to do and
> >> have no connection with or privileged access to the manufacturer, e.g.
> >> Consumer Reports.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >> Nathan Wajsman
> >> Alicante, Spain
> >> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> >> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <
> >> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> <
> >> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> >> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <
> >> http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> >> YNWA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 18 Nov 2015, at 17:16, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There are lots of reviews if you just Google Leica SL reviews, but you
> do
> >>> have to ignore the Leica-haters and there are a lot of them out there!
> >>>
> >>> Tina
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > http://
> > <
> http://t.sidekickopen28.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=f026e4f1-5e16-462f-87dd-cef12a4d7f92
> >
> > www.tinamanley.com
> > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] SL Review)
Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] SL Review)
Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] SL Review)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] off list Re: SL Review)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] SL Review)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] SL Review)