Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan, Yes, but, perhaps, even they are possibly conscious of the legacy of the camera they've bought, and don't really want to damage its resale value for future off loading by badmouthing it. Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:44 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] SL Review > But equally important is to weed out the corporate shills. Anybody who has > a prototype from Leica is an insider in my view, and I certainly take such > a person?s reviews with a big grain of salt. The most trustworthy reviews > are by people who buy the equipment like you and I would have to do and > have no connection with or privileged access to the manufacturer, e.g. > Consumer Reports. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> > http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 18 Nov 2015, at 17:16, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: >> >> There are lots of reviews if you just Google Leica SL reviews, but you do >> have to ignore the Leica-haters and there are a lot of them out there! >> >> Tina > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information