Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I remember how proud I was when I figured out how to use a slide rule from reading articles in books I was in the 6th or 7th grade and thought that stick was pretty close to magic Never did get one of those glorious bamboo ones ric > On Nov 3, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > > Hi Larry, > > I have to admit to having an E-6B, a gift from one of the kids, shortly > before I received two mechanical heart valves, and had to give up flying. > I never learned to manipulate it, though that brings to mind a cardboard > circular from Exxon that I carried in my flight kit. My kids went off to > college in the 70s, and I still have some TI and HP calculators in drawers > behind me. I have used an HP 32S for the last 25 years and it is still > doing fine by me. > > I have also "killed" a few old cameras over the years, in search of > knowledge of how they worked. Packed away, I have everything from my > father-in-law's wooden 8x10 studio camera to a Polaroid SX-70. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > On 11/3/2015 2:23 PM, Larry Zeitlin via LUG wrote: >> Jim, >> It is good to see that another old timer recognizes the wonders of >> the slide rule. When you used a slide rule you had to partially solve the >> problem in your head. The slide rule simply gave you the mantissa, the >> significant figures, not the exponent. So you had to have some idea of >> the magnitude of the answer. Thus .03 and 300 look alike. The learned >> ability to estimate the magnitude of an answer is lost with most modern >> computing methods. I often got absurd answers from many of my students >> who used the latest electronic calculators. >> The slide rule is still the best tool for figuring out proportions. >> A circular slide rule was awkward to carry but it never went off the >> scale and the length was far greater than the physical dimension. A 6 >> inch circular rule is equivalent to an 18 inch linear one. It could be >> easily read to three significant figures and a fourth figure could be >> estimated. I believe that a number of pilots still use E6B circular slide >> rules, reddubbed as ?Aviation Flight Computers.? Again, no batteries >> needed. >> As I said there is a lot of other stuff interred in the bottom >> drawers, including 8, yes 8, Leicas ranging from a IIIb to a pair of M3s, >> an old digital Leica (rebadged from a Fuji), a Russian imitation of a >> Nazi Luftwaffe Leica. a 1927 Leica 1 and a CL. I?m not a collector, just >> a pack rat. I bought cheap stuff, Leicas, Robots, Contaxes and Minoxes >> from old camera stores and put them back in working condition, although I >> had the M3s CLAd by Sherri Krauter. But as I said in a long ago post my >> kids will probably discard all the antique cameras, wondering what the >> old man did with all that mechanical junk when all photography is digital. >> I confess that I gave into the siren song of electronics by buying >> one of the first HP 35 calculators for the outrageous sum of $395. It was >> replaced with an HP 45 and then an HP 65. All at ever lowering prices. A >> couple of years ago I bought a half dozen Chinese made calculators with >> far more capability than the HP models. They cost $1 each. I can afford >> to throw them away when the batteries die. Digital photography seems to >> be following the same route. >> Larry Z >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information