Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Jackie And Her Pups
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 22:16:44 -0700
References: <CAJ4y7gwNw0VEtYkhwEjGnQ9oL8G3gek1XeyOhqtDgDN1gXEOew@mail.gmail.com> <A02D4C94-5944-4CD5-AA9D-08EB6209A5AC@fastmail.com> <66C5DE17-E66B-4D2D-838F-E5CAB395912A@gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gwT889MQHymYLuv6zETtKYnTfh41JiZxXE=QsQjKRhAxQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Oct 31, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Generally 15 to 20 pounds but can be smaller, usually should not be heavier
> but you can have one who is, well, large boned.
> 
> Unfortunately the breed is prone to mitral valve disease


insufficiency? or prolapse? or ?


I assume purely genetic, runs in certain lines?

s





> so we think
> lighter is better from a health standpoint; we carefully monitor our dogs
> and their parents and grandparents for health issues.
> 
> ==On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
> gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> how heavy are these full grown?
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Jackie And Her Pups)
Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Jackie And Her Pups)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Jackie And Her Pups)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Jackie And Her Pups)