Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But it is a mirrorless, for gosh sake. It should be much smaller, like the Q. Image stabilization in the body would also probably have helped with the size of the lenses, too. Aram Aram Langhans (Semi) Retired Science Teacher & Unemployed photographer ? ?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself would ever have dared dream.??? James D. Watson -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Barry [mailto:imra at iol.ie] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 7:32 AM To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Subject: Re: [Leica] BIG new Leica Indeed, it seems very large, but surely they should have sized it against the Nikon D4S or the Canon 1D C or wherever as it's supposed to have press aspirations. It appears to be significantly lighter than the D4S. Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 2:06 PM Subject: [Leica] BIG new Leica >I said it is BIG! > > http://www.photographyblog.com/news/leica_sl_vs_sony_a7r_ii_side_by_side_com parison/ > > -- > Regards, > > Sonny > http://sonc.com/look/ > Natchitoches, Louisiana > 1714 > Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase > > USA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >