[Leica] Comparing Summilux vs2 / Sonnetar

[photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)]

Fully agree. The Sonnetar bokeh in the last image is unpleasant. The 
Summilux is far superior in this regard. Actually, I had never heard of the 
Sonnetar and had to google it to find out what it is.

Un abrazo,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
<http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
<http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
YNWA













> On 18 Oct 2015, at 20:44, lluisripollphotography <lluisripollphotography 
> at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have improved the original posted picture thanks to the advice of a 
> friend (thank you Mike!), the two first are the improved and the original 
> version. The third and fourth comparing Summilux and Sonnetar. In my 
> opinion rendition are very similar and at least here I prefer the Lux, in 
> my opinion the Sonnetar gives a bokeh not very nice when used at wide 
> apertures.
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009268+2.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Sonnetar at f 1.1 (improved Burning)
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009268.jpg.html>
> First posted Leica MM, Sonnetar at f 1.1 (will be deleted)
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009283.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Summilux 50 vs2 at f 1.4
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20151015_L1009272.jpg.html>
> Leica MM, Sonnetar 50mm at f 1.4
> 
> Thanks for looking!
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information