Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan, the M (240) has an entirely different sensor. In the first place, it is CMOS. The M9 sensor is CCD. I don?t know all that much about the difference in practice, except that the CMOS has remarkably less noise at extravagantly high ISO. There may still be quality control problems these days with Leica. My M arrived with two-year-old firmware, and when the firmware was brought up to date, a problem showed up which forced Leica to replace the circuit board. However, my Fuji X100S had to be sent back twice for a defective switch because the low-level types who first checked it out when it was sent in for warranty repair reported it flawless and returned it untouched. This just says I had bad luck. Most people have not had any problems, judging by the reaction when I did some bellyaching on the LUG last year. Herbert Kanner kanner at acm.org Question Authority and the authorities will question you. > On Sep 25, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Nathan Wajsman <nwajsman at gmail.com> wrote: > > This effectively means that I will most likely never buy a Leica body > again :-( > The new ones are priced out of my range, and given these reliability > issues, a second-hand M9 or M240 are too much of a crap shoot. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 26 Sep 2015, at 00:09, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: >> >> Uh huh, so you have not read about the Leica/Kodak issues? Or have you >> seen >> dust on the sensor that looks this? I haven't..... >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.fr at leica-users.org] On >> Behalf Of >> Mark Rabiner >> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 9:46 p.m. >> To: Leica Users Group >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Sensor corrosion? >> >> Looks like someone sneezed when you were changing lenses. >> My snot on sensor issues seems to have vanisish with my last camera which >> had a sensor vibrate thing built into it which vibrates everything off >> when >> you turn the camera on or off and really does a heck of a job. I have a >> totally clean sensor on a five year old camera. Yet I'm doing a whole lot >> more lens changing now actually carrying a second lens with me all day and >> eschewing zooms for 1.8 primes. >> >> >> On 9/25/15 3:06 PM, "Leland Deane" <leland.deane at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I agree it's sensor disease. It hit my M9 (now gone) and it has just >>> hit my Monochrome (about to be sent it for sensor replacement) >>> >>> Leland >>> >>> >>> >>> John yes I agree it looks like the corrosion issue. There are sample >>> issues somewhere in Leica Camera's official response if you wanted to >>> search those out. Were it mine I would be contacting for a repair booking >> for sure. >>> >>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 7:57 pm John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: >>> >>>> To those who have had affected sensors, does this look like sensor >>>> corrosion? These are screen grabs of 100% image and it does not look >>>> like dust or similar.. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Chiaroscuro/Misc/SensorCorrosion.png >>>> .html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> john >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information