Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Voightlander 1.5 or zeiss 2.0?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:46:22 -0500
References: <1423CEF2-8E31-4622-A401-1BA14CAC498F@gmail.com>
 
It sure looks like they are close in performance and price.  It would 
depend on whether you like a lug-like grip on the focusing ring, or 
smaller grooves.

There is one "not bad" review on the B&H site that you might like to read.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 9/16/2015 4:23 PM, Kyle Cassidy On The LUG wrote:
> So I can get a voightlander 50 1.5 in m mount or the zeiss 50mm 2.0. Same 
> price. Which would you go with? I'm leaning toward the voightlander for 
> the extra stop because the m9 is useless above 400.....
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Sent from my iPhone plz excuse the typoss keyb0ard is reaLly small.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Voightlander 1.5 or zeiss 2.0?)
 In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (Kyle Cassidy On The LUG) ([Leica] Voightlander 1.5 or zeiss 2.0?)