Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Red Admiral
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:38:36 -0500
References: <55EB0B09.7020804@lighttube.net> <55EBA59B.7080707@jayburleson.com>

Thanks, Jay.  I think that the Canon 50s, as well as the Pentax 50 and 
55s, are all overlooked.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 9/5/2015 9:31 PM, Jay Burleson wrote:
> Jim, very, very nice.
> I think those Canon LTM 50's (1.2, 1.4 & 1.8) are way under-rated 
> lenses and can perform, as demonstrated here, quite nicely on digital 
> bodies.
> I need to use my 50 1.2 more often.
>
> Jay
>
> On 9/5/2015 8:32 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> I walked out to the Buddleia Bush to try out a Canon 50/1.4 lens, and
>> spotted a butterfly that I had not seen previously.  I took a few shots
>> wide open to make it easier to focus manually, and then searched on-line
>> to identify the butterfly.  It appears to be a Red Admiral.
>>
>> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Red+Admiral.TIFF.html
>>
>> Fuji X-E1 with Canon 50/1.4 LTM lens
>>
>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Red Admiral)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] IMG: Red Admiral)