Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Jay. I think that the Canon 50s, as well as the Pentax 50 and 55s, are all overlooked. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA On 9/5/2015 9:31 PM, Jay Burleson wrote: > Jim, very, very nice. > I think those Canon LTM 50's (1.2, 1.4 & 1.8) are way under-rated > lenses and can perform, as demonstrated here, quite nicely on digital > bodies. > I need to use my 50 1.2 more often. > > Jay > > On 9/5/2015 8:32 AM, Jim Nichols wrote: >> I walked out to the Buddleia Bush to try out a Canon 50/1.4 lens, and >> spotted a butterfly that I had not seen previously. I took a few shots >> wide open to make it easier to focus manually, and then searched on-line >> to identify the butterfly. It appears to be a Red Admiral. >> >> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Red+Admiral.TIFF.html >> >> Fuji X-E1 with Canon 50/1.4 LTM lens >> >> Comments and critiques welcomed. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >