[Leica] IMG: Bench At San Pedro Valley State Park

[jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)]

Bob,

I've never used 645, but looked it up.  The actual image size is 
56x41.5, just a little larger than your 54x40, but quite similar, so I 
guess it was the closest existing size they could make reference to.  
Anything else that I could add would be pure speculation.  We never do 
that, do we? :-)

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 7/10/2015 7:42 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
> So 54mmX40.5mm SIZE sensor = approx. 5x4 proportion?
> So why do they refer to it as a 645 sensor size??
> Thanks George for tolerating my ignorance!!
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, George Lottermoser <
> george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 10, 2015, at 4:41 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:45 PM, Bob Adler wrote:
>>>
>>>> But still confused by shape vs size...
>>>> Thanks for noodling this!
>>> Shape 4:5, 6:9, 5:7, etc
>>>
>>> Size 4x5 inches, 6x9 centimeters, 5x7 inches, etc
>> a 24 x 36 mm SIZE frame = 2:3 PROPORTION SHAPE
>> a 6 x 9 cm SIZE frame = 2:3 PROPORTION SHAPE
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>>
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>