Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop
From: gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 05:55:46 +0100
References: <4BD16496-6166-4374-8CA4-122522965573@sfr.fr>

For me the first is better. It is more open and has a certain space to it. 
If I had not seen the first then I would have been happy with the second, 
but seeing them side by side the second crop seems oppressive/constrained.

Great b&w BTW. What post-processing did you use? How do you like the X-T1?

Best wishes

Gerry

Gerry Walden
023 8046 3076

> On 25 May 2015, at 10:54, Philippe <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
> 
> TIA for letting me know which of these crops works better, if either does, 
> and why if you have time to explain.
> FYI, my doubts come from a different perception when seen small or large, 
> so thanks for your precious feedback.
> 
> SWH 2 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--2.jpg.html
> SWH 3
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Doulce+France/Somewhereheim--3.jpg.html
> 
> Amities
> Philippe, sorry for duplicates.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop - THANKS, MANY OF THEM :-))
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe) ([Leica] QRY: Feedback needed on crop)