Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lens Choices
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:04:49 -0500
References: <55395D67.10602@lighttube.net> <72598813-EAB7-410B-83AF-706CD96F03B6@icloud.com> <55396EA3.3040800@lighttube.net> <0E6D9D93-B16F-4134-948A-FC274EF307A1@icloud.com>

You inspired me to speak my piece a little earlier than I had intended, 
but I think we understand each other.  I'm sorry for the confusion 
brought about by my poorly chosen subject line.

See my wrap-up tonight.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 4/23/2015 7:02 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> Certainly not going against my grain here Jim.
> Pentax, Olympus, Nikon, Canon, Schneider, Rodenstock, Mamiya, Fuji, 
> Goertz, Cooke, have all earned their rightful places along side Leica, 
> Zeiss and many others. I've made photographs with each and every one of 
> those names at one time or another.
>
> My only point had to do with the subject line, "Lens Choices" and the 
> showing of examples from lenses without naming even the focal length.
>
> I get that some folks consider the "image" as the only important thing 
> about posting photographs on the list. Though obviously we do have 
> interests in the hardware as well as the content and processing and the 
> list could go on.
>
> Personally I like knowing that Alan loves 50 mm and longer lenses; and I'm 
> also interested in his eclectic collection of vintage canon, nikon, leica, 
> olympus and other mfg's.
>
> a note off the iPad, George
>
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> I realize I am going against the grain here.  I am resisting the 
>> conventional "wisdom" that, if it is not made by Leica or Zeiss, etc, 
>> then it has to be junk.  The same holds for earlier models.  I feel a 
>> lens should be evaluated on what it can do for ME, not what the "experts" 
>> claim.
>>
>> This is to show, especially to me, that my lens of choice, which happens 
>> to be a Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 50/1.4 (7-element lens) from 
>> around 1971, can do a reasonable job for me without having to spend a 
>> small fortune for the latest and greatest lens, that is admittedly 
>> somewhat better, but at what cost?
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Lens Choices)