Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lens Choices
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:33:42 -0700
References: <55395D67.10602@lighttube.net> <72598813-EAB7-410B-83AF-706CD96F03B6@icloud.com> <55396EA3.3040800@lighttube.net>

> On Apr 23, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> George,
> 
> I realize I am going against the grain here.  I am resisting the 
> conventional "wisdom" that, if it is not made by Leica or Zeiss, etc, then 
> it has to be junk.  The same holds for earlier models.  I feel a lens 
> should be evaluated on what it can do for ME, not what the "experts" claim.
> 
> This is to show, especially to me, that my lens of choice, which happens 
> to be a Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 50/1.4 (7-element lens) from 
> around 1971, can do a reasonable job for me without having to spend a 
> small fortune for the latest and greatest lens, that is admittedly 
> somewhat better, but at what cost?


totally agree, I am impressed by the photos from an impressive lens?

I have used this lens for years and still have it, I have used it on a 
Pentax Spotmatic from the sixties?

Pentax made great lenses, no apologies needed,


steve


> 
> Since I'm getting few comments, I suspect no one else cares.
> 
> Thanks for commenting.
> 
> Here is my favorite image made with this lens, several Christmases ago:
> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Katie+Grace+_amp_+Kristin.jpg.html
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> 
> On 4/23/2015 4:30 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>> On Apr 23, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> 
>>> This third image, shot from my neighbor's yard across the street, shows 
>>> that things are greening up at my house, and the bushes are in real need 
>>> of trimming.  As a general purpose lens, this lens provides plenty of 
>>> detail without enhancement.  This raw image was converted with no 
>>> special adjustment, and the image was resized.
>>> 
>>> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/House.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>> As you're presenting "lens tests" with the subject line "Lens Choices"
>> It would be a bit more interesting if you mentioned what lens we're 
>> looking at a sample from.
>> 
>> Not in the text and not in the EXIF - so what "Choices" are you making?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> 
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Lens Choices)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Lens Choices)