Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photo show dissent
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:46:26 -0400

Just saw your jpegs her and the last two are great photos.
So that's great art.
Sorry!


On 3/22/15 4:39 PM, "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> wrote:

> I just came back from the Westchester Photo Show where four of my older
> photographs were hung. They stood out like sore thumbs. Not because they 
> were
> inferior but because they were different. All of mine were street photos or
> pseudo street photos, slices of life taken in my usual adventitious manner.
> Several were in my LUG gallery and were taken on film. I'd be the first to
> admit that they are not great pictures but they were a sample of my
> photographic endeavors.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Cook.jpeg.html
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Coppersmith.jpg.html
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/The+valve+room.jpg.html
> Most of the other pictures exhibited were carefully posed, highly processed
> images which tried to emulate fine art. I've always believed, as have most
> Luggers, that art and photography are two different media, each with its
> advantages and disadvantages. An artist can take time to pose the subject
> appropriately, choose colors, and accentuate what he or she chooses. It is 
> a
> contemplative and imaginative medium. Photography, on the other hand, is 
> ideal
> for catching slices of life which may vanish in a fraction of a second.?It 
> is
> a realistic and immediate medium.
> What was most interesting is that several exhibiting photographers 
> maintained
> that the original image was not the end in itself but merely the starting
> point for intensive manipulation in Photoshop. Indeed, some of the pictures
> were so significantly altered that they bore little resemblence to the 
> actual
> scene. Colors were changed, portions of the image were accentuated or
> eliminated. The worst case, in my opinion, was a photograph which combined
> several individual photos in one displayed image. Just like the Russian 
> Mayday
> podium pictures.
> I'm coming to believe that exhibited photos should bear a warning label, 
> like
> foodstuffs, noting if any artificial ingredients were used in the
> presentation.
> Larry Z
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Photo show dissent)