Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Too many or too few pictures.
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:21:31 -0500
References: <D13471F9.35A52%mark@rabinergroup.com>

And yet he didn't!

-----Original Message----- 
From: Mark Rabiner
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 12:19 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Too many or too few pictures.

What if the elephant blinked?


On 3/21/15 7:55 PM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> When I was shooting the hasselblad, all I had were a couple of A12 backs. 
> I
> got it to a point where I could shoot all I needed (easy because I was 
> also
> writing and preparing the publication) on a single roll. It turned out to 
> be
> a good dicipline and now with digital, I don't shoot a lot of frames. 
> Even
> shooting animals in Africa, I shot single frame and did rather well.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Zeitlin via LUG
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 4:07 PM
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] Too many or too few pictures.
>
> When I started newspaper work in 1948 I was handed a 4x5 Speed Graphic and
> six film holders. The photo editor felt?that was more than enough for any
> assignment. It was frowned on to use more than three holders, i.e. six
> shots. Any more would put an intolerable load on processing and editing. I
> was told to previsualize and edit in my mind.
>
>
> I counted a number of magazine photographers amongst my mentors. They used
> Rolliflexes, not because they could get better quality out of the small 
> 6x6
> cm negative but because they could squeeze 12 shots on a roll of 120 film.
> Leicas were around, of course, but to the best of my knowledge no Boston
> newspaper published a photo taken with one until the mid 50s. And those 
> were
> photos taken during the Korean war.
>
>
> Being a professional is not a matter of quality. Many amateur Luggers take
> pictures as good as those that call themselves professionals. The 
> advantage
> in not being professional is that you don't have to make a living out of
> your craft. I.e. you don't have to cover your ass. If you take pictures 
> for
> your own pleasure you can march to your own drummer. You need not bow to 
> the
> demands of the buyer.
>
>
> Larry Z
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Too many or too few pictures.)