Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:36:37 -0700
References: <CA+yJO1B1q37ZLLJ-eZ4QGJabfsq_M0jCJ1=_QpQ7hs+0Lts-zQ@mail.gmail.com> <D1324965.35837%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CA+yJO1BFQLu-HgaeixV2nDURUXnmcAfhWkG3R9bcB5ivCRdcKg@mail.gmail.com> <52000DE2-7C00-4045-BEE6-F7F1B39D34CB@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1Csm8GUWDXtSM6ThT0OJF4nKfyS77pw5nFcfpCeqz4eRQ@mail.gmail.com>

In all my years of shooting, I have never regretted coming home with a shot, 
but I have often regretted not coming home with a shot that I didn't take 
because I hesitated, fiddled with the camera, ran out of film (battery), 
thought a better one would come along and in other ways thought 'next time'. 
Next times don't come and they don't look the same. If you want it, shoot it 
NOW! If a better situation develops later, shoot that too.

Shooting professionally, the mantra was 'Film is cheap'. It wasn't, but the 
sentiment holds true. Now it's digital, shooting is cheaper on a per shot 
basis, and all you got to do is learn how to quickly edit. All you got to 
do. It takes a while, and you have to learn how to edit to suit your 
situation, but you can deal with it. Just don't not shoot, especially if you 
want/need that picture.

And then there are some afternoons when a cafe with an espresso is more 
important.

Henning


On 2015-03-21, at 5:57 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, that is true, Nathan; however, when I was using film I would carry 300
> rolls of film for a week in Honduras or Guatemala.  I didn't always use all
> 300 but, since there is no way to buy film in the remote villages of
> Central America, my worst nightmare was to be staying with a family and run
> out of film.  I never ran out but sometimes I did use all 300 rolls because
> I was there and would probably never have the opportunity to photograph
> that family in that village again.  That's 10,800 photos per week - more
> than I am averaging now with digital.  Those I also had to develop, mount
> and file.  Now, as I scan all of those film photos, I am glad I took so
> many and sometimes even wish for more with a choice of a slightly different
> exposure or lens.  I don't think I use a machine-gun approach.  Every frame
> is different in some way.  During those years, I was taking photos for
> several different agencies, for myself and for the families - all requiring
> a different focus on the purpose of the photos.
> 
> I will be 70 years old this year and I'm afraid it's too late to change the
> way I work - until I decide to retire (die)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tina,
>> 
>> May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many photos,
>> just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a figure of 16000 
>> from
>> your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize that I
>> am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also understand that for 
>> your
>> stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but still 
>> the
>> number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing process, 
>> it
>> seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them.
>> Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for your
>> health?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> 
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 21 Mar 2015, at 03:15, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You are right, Mark.  I need to tweak all of them before I judge them.  I
>>> am 69 years old.  I won't have time.  I'm still scanning, all day every
>>> day, the film from over 40 years of photography.  I just finished
>> scanning
>>> 11,274 slides of Portugal  I'm starting on Spain now, while I continue to
>>> edit the photos from Cuba and Vietnam.
>>> 
>>> Life is entirely too short.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Tina
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Henning Wulff
henningw at archiphoto.com






Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
In reply to: Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)