Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:30:44 +0100
References: <54FE9840.9010802@threshinc.com> <85026E4F-1BE8-4193-9771-E566B70EDC7B@frozenlight.eu> <CAFU3ov+46hu1WZAX8kvaaWuFup7sQZnKY3GA1vARdAfiZ_G_4Q@mail.gmail.com> <802F2A40-0A3F-473A-84F6-76811011ADBE@frozenlight.eu> <CAFU3ovJ1CPTTucuuOkSDT3U4YcQJ=5sLn8S6WmGz74QYeK9o0Q@mail.gmail.com> <004701d05bba$740dcad0$5c296070$@verizon.net>

Yes, IR is a big reason why I will keep my M8 no matter what, especially 
since it is worth very little in the marketplace these days. I just shot a 
few IR images on the beach yesterday.

But the fast writes are a must for me, otherwise the camera would be useless 
for my kind of photography.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













> On 11 Mar 2015, at 06:15, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> And you get to take IR photos as well with the M8.... Try that with an 
> M(240)!   ( I did, it sucks.  Ditto the M9.  Anyone know about the MM for 
> IR photography?))
> Nothing I do requires ( emphasized) the use of a big buffer or fast writes.
> 
> Never sell a piece of Leica equipment,  YOU WILL REGRET IT......
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> No argument there, Nathan--the Fujis do an amazing job in low light.  I'm 
> just pointing out a way to extend the M8's low light abilities. My E-M5 is 
> a little too laggy to be a real decisive-moment camera.  I often prefer RF 
> focusing and direct optical viewing in low light situations. If I can get 
> it with a little computer-geek sleight of hand, why not?  The jury is 
> still out on whether the con side is worth it--i.e, the buffer limitations 
> and the fact that you have to turn off battery save to avoid losing the 
> RAW setting.  But so far, it looks promising. And it's cheaper than 
> blowing $7 or $8K for an M240 or an MM.
> 
> --Peter
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> wrote:
> 
>> When the light is good (i.e. ISO less than or equal to 640) then my M8 
>> is the best camera I have ever owned. And so that is the camera I use 
>> much of the time around Alicance, a rather sunny place. But when the 
>> light is not so good, then my Fuji X-T1 is far superior, and so this 
>> is the camera I am taking to Brussels next week, to Geneva the week 
>> after that and to Paris that week after that because those are 
>> business trips and so most of my photography will be after sunset.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)
Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)
Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M8 RAW--high ISO improvement!)