Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My family practice physician suggested that I discontinue PSA screening after age 70, even though I had increasing scores over a few years but without a dramatic velocity. That was fine with me since I had to abstain from alcohol or caffeine for three weeks prior to each test (alcohol, OK, but caffeine is another matter altogether). Ken On 2/22/2015 5:07 PM, Charlie Chan wrote: > The PSA test is not a great screening tool. The PSA goes up in some men, > who have benign prostatic enlargement. > > PSA is, however, much more widely accepted as tumour marker for men with > diagnosed prostate cancer, when one can monitor for disease progression > with PSA. > > Prostate cancer is the male equivalent of breast cancer in women - i.e. it > is common and often dependent on hormones for growth (testosterone for > prostate and oestrogen for breast). Like breast cancer, there is > increasing acceptance that some patents with breast/prostate cancer may > not have biologically significant disease - i.e. that their particular low > grade, indolent tumour may not alter one?s remaining life expectancy. > > Prostate cancer is very common in older men. In post mortem studies on > men, who have died from other causes, 50% of men over 80 were found to > have a prostate cancer (which was undiagnosed and asymptomatic). Some men > will have low grade prostate cancer, which may not progress in one?s > lifetime, if untreated. However, the conundrum is that non treatment is a > difficult concept for many patients. > > I treat people with breast cancer. We have had the same dilemna with > ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and some small low grade breast > cancer. Breast screening has increased the number of cancers diagnosed on > both sides of the Atlantic, but there is some quite powerful evidence that > we are detecting some breast tumours, which may not cause problems during > one?s lifetime (Archie Bleyer, NEJM 2012; Peter Gotzsche, Lancet 1999 for > instance). > > So the tricky problem comes in deciding which tumour is bad and which is > ok (and possibly able to be left). Undoubtedly we will have reliable ways > of assessing this in the next 10 years or so, with advances in genomic or > proteomic profiling. That may not help George at this moment in time, but > other more traditional ways of scoring prostate cancer (if indeed this is > what it proves to be, rather than a false alarm). > > > Charlie > > Charlie Chan DPhil FRCS (that?s my other hat!) > Consultant Surgeon, Cheltenham UK > > > > On 22 Feb 2015, at 22:39, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:58 AM, Douglas Nygren via LUG <lug at >>> leica-users.org> wrote: >>> >>> One of my doctors told me that every man's prostate will eventually kill >>> him. If we could live forever, our prostates would do us in nevertheless. >>> That said, I read somewhere, if I am not mistaken, that the doctor who >>> invented the PSA no longer believes in it. >> who ? why? is this documented? >> >> >> s >> >> >>> I reported such to my doctor who nevertheless thinks the test is a good >>> idea. >>> "In tests we believe," should be printed on the dollar bill. It's like >>> military weapons in the hands of the police. If you've got them, you've >>> got to use them. >>> If you don't test and the patient gets prostate cancer, you are liable, >>> I would guess. >>> If your PSA gives a false alarms, your doctor is not in danger of being >>> sued. >>> Personally, I abide by what the U.S. Surgeon General may have said, >>> namely, Science has proven that life is hazardous to your health. >>> BTW, I do get my PSA checked. >>> Cheers?? Doug >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information