Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50mm f2 or 90mm f2.8?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:41:20 +0100
References: <27959C8E-EE6E-44D8-841A-5DBACB82325B@gmail.com> <CABXy406QwffNmko3FFwjwpUZ9AGT6CN8Y1AnVgi2tz_qiuospw@mail.gmail.com>

Exactly. And I have both of these lenses.

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













> On 18 Feb 2015, at 06:03, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.com> wrote:
> 
> 50 Summicron, without a doubt.
> 
> It gives you more options... to include the environment, or to focus on the
> principal subjects themselves. You can always crop to obtain the angle of
> view of a 90mm. There are plenty of pixels already.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Kyle Cassidy On The LUG <
> leicaslacker at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> You have to take a portrait of two people. In a big space. You can only
>> bring one lens a 50 Summicron or a 90 tele emarit --
>> You will of course shoot wide open.
>> 
>> Which do you choose and why.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ken Iisaka
> first name at last name dot org or com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (Kyle Cassidy On The LUG) ([Leica] 50mm f2 or 90mm f2.8?)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] 50mm f2 or 90mm f2.8?)