Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Backlight HERB KANNER/LLuis
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:08:07 +0100
References: <41483176-9EBB-4439-9057-B7E82A0BCB4B@gmail.com> <008c01d0339a$9392dc80$bab89580$@ca> <F22E64C9-B27C-4E19-B885-07F978291A8A@acm.org> <000101d03412$895996f0$9c0cc4d0$@ca>

Ted, Herbert, Jayanand

Thank you very much for looking and thank you very much for your comments, I 
recognize Ted and Jayanand are right ? I?ve missed the perfect composition 
here, but also I?ve made a mistake in the cropping when I was trying avoid 
the lamp on the right, here I?ve posted it with almost the original framing, 
but even so it is not perfect!

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20150117_L1002532+1.jpg.html>
 
Thank you very much again, always we can learn through our mistakes!

Cheers!
Lluis



El 19/01/2015, a las 19:05, Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca> escribi?:

> Herbert Kanner OFFERED:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Backlight
> 
>>>>> I looked at that shot and my instant reaction was ?that?s beautiful?. 
>>>>> Then I read your criticism. I looked at the shot again and said to 
>>>>> myself: ?So what!?.<<<<
> 
> Hi Herb,
> Sorry mate you are partially correct.  But I am REALLY CORRECT!
> 
> Here's the difference.
> 1/ Your definition? Is correct. If it were an amateur learning 
> grab-shooting just missing the complete shadow "which was there!" 
> mille-seconds before!
> 
> "Lluis" as we all know, rarely ever misses the 100% perfect frame! Which 
> should have been the case here with complete shadow. And his talent and 
> quick of "SEE- CLICK!" Unfortunately "HE MISSED THE WHOLE PERFECT FRAME!' 
> 
> The difference between your comment and mine?  
> 
> I'm a mean "TOUGH-PHOTO EDITOR" trained by some of the most mean-assed 
> Mother Photo editors over 65 years who could make you cry when you think 
> you have a "cool image!" Then they would take a big  pair of 
> scissor-shears and cut, "Your glorious photo" to ribbons! Not in private! 
> But right in front of other photographers and everyone received a lesson 
> on improvement and only the best will/would do!
> 
> Your response of... "?So what!?.<<??? If I or one of the other 
> photographers responded with that kind of "amateur retort?"  You collected 
> your last pay cheque on the way out! 
> 
> Photography in a group as we are, little things slip by. For me in many 
> cases to be absolutely ice cutting mean-assed all in the line of 
> teaching/assisting/helping/encouraging / whatever? I do not say anything 
> as I  don't want to hurt some ones feelings! Often I have sent a private 
> note. WHY? To avoided the tirade of re-buttal's covering a week or weeks 
> of endless chatter! Usually by those who disagree!
> 
> Am I a perfect editor?  "NOT ON YOUR COTTEN-PICKING LIFE!"
> 
> But Lluis is a super talented gifted photographer! We see it daily! So 
> when a mean-assed mother as myself can be? I'm not going to let a dear 
> friend talented photographer as Lluis is! Get away with shooting an 
> Amateur result photo!!" Yeah it's not bad for a guy in an amateur camera 
> club!
> 
> BUT Luis? NEVER! 
> 
> cheers,
> Dr. ted :-)
> (the mean-assed photo-editor!" :-)  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Backlight)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Backlight)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] Backlight)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Backlight HERB KANNER/LLuis)