Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve one collateral benefit of the live view with the M (typ 240) at least is tht you can check precisely what any lens is delivering to the sensor at any setting so you can check precisely the calibration state of lens and RF. With a lens like the Earlier Noctis or the Summilux 35 with a perfectly calibrated system you can see exactly the consequence of focus shift for example. The ideal state would depend on just what you pick of course. I mean if wide open at x distance is your favoured plan tht may not be exactly the same as say f/4 at same distance for example. I never tried any of the Sonys but again just with the M and so only MF lenses of course for me the RF is consistently more precise thanLive-view for most applications. I can think of a couple of scenarios which are exceptions. On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Lluis Ripoll < > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Thank you Steve, This will be a very interesting test. I have to tell > you that I've get a big improvement on my Lux 75 after I've sent it to > Wetzlar to be calibrated, at the same time I've ordered add the 6 bit > coding, but I think this has not any influence in focusing precision. > > > calibration helps, but there is no way a week later or a year later, to > know if it remains in the same good calibration....aye there's the rub... > > > > > > Amiti?s > > Lluis > > > > El 13/12/2014, a las 01:40, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com > <javascript:;>> escribi?: > > > >> > >>> On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Lluis Ripoll < > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Your Hospital images are unforgettable! > >> > >> > >> you are very kind Lluis, here I am thinking of the technical issues > only, I may when time allows simply do a series of dandelion shots: w Nocti > at f1 and Summilux 75mm at f1.4, on the Sony 7, to have a look... > >> > >> > >> steve > >> > >> > >>> Amiti?s > >>> Lluis > >>> > >>> > >>> El 13/12/2014, a las 01:16, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com > <javascript:;>> escribi?: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Lluis Ripoll < > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sonny, > >>>>> > >>>>> I've never owned a Noctilux, just play with some ones borrowed by > friends but what do you say is in my opinion one of the characteristics > things of this lens, it is difficult obtain a perfect picture but when yo > got it it is exceptional...! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> exactly Lluis, a major reason why it's difficult, is the need to > obtain perfect focus at f1. When you focus imo with a Sony EVF with focus > peaking, it's far easier to nail the focus.... > >>>> > >>>> my experience with focussing a Noctilux at f1 derived from my earlier > kids in hospital images.... > >>>> > >>>> steve > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> Lluis > >>>>> > >>>>> El 12/12/2014, a las 22:57, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com > <javascript:;>> escribi?: > >>>>> > >>>>>> The point is to walk away with the image that you had in mind. The > image > >>>>>> that I wanted to show you. Look! See what I see? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I was unsuccessful with a Noctilux and made maybe three really > wonderful > >>>>>> shots in the year I owned it, and a couple dozen I liked. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (Ironically, two of the shots were made into posters and sold > several > >>>>>> hundred copies for the Natchitoches Historic Foundation.) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If I > >>>>>> still > >>>>>> had it with a Sony or an M, I would be out there with it glued to my > >>>>>> camera, because I'm crazy for available dark pictures > >>>>>> , and I know I'd be lovin' it and you guys would be lookin' at > that EXIF > >>>>>> line and wishing you were me. ;-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sonny > >>>>>> http://sonc.com/look/ > >>>>>> Natchitoches, Louisiana > >>>>>> 1714 > >>>>>> Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase > >>>>>> > >>>>>> USA > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman