Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I prefer sharp. fuzzy seems a little gimicky. I am a fan of non-sharp generally speaking, for what it's worth. Sue > On Dec 16, 2014, at 3:14 AM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > wrote: > > I am starting to do a series on "Old Buildings that have not been Torn Down > Yet" (*may be slightly tongue in cheek*) Anyway, I am considering whether > to use one of those old style fuzzy-lens to get certain effect and feelings > across. Attached are 2 pics from the fuzzy-lens and 2 from normal 4x5 lens. > The Stanford Theater shows up on both set so can serve as nice comparison. > > What are you opinions? Which "style" speak to you more? I know the "correct > answer" is which one *I* prefer, but like to hear others' opinions. > Thanks. > > SHARP! > > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141205-Scanned-645.jpg > > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-654.jpg > > FUZZY > > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-652.jpg > > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20141215-Scanned-653.jpg > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto > // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information