Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Did you read my 10% reply to Sue? Basically, at best, the M240 may get you 10% better photos. How many photos are you happy with now? Lets see it's 10 out of 100. With the M240, you get... 11 photos. Is it worth it to sell the M9 for $4000-$4500 and gte an M240 for that extra photo? You shall be the judge. But there is nothing against people wanting the next best thing, so.... On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Leland Deane <lmdmd at att.net> wrote: > OK, so I'm a fairly happy M9 guy (see attached) and it's done well by me > but M9's are doing well on the used market and I have considered trading > in/selling to get the M240. So....I need the honest and august opinions of > this great group to tell me if I'm crazy. I am all about the sensor quality > and do not in particular need 'live view' (have that on my Canon 5D mark > III) or video capabilities. For those of you with both or who have had > both, please give me your impressions of one vs. the other. > Much appreciated. > Recent photo of my kids attached---lightly processed in CC (view large) > Thanks, > Leland > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits