Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I still cannot see much difference, at least viewing these tiny jpgs, but then my eyesight is not as sharp as it should be! I reiterate, IMHO, that for the style of photography you do, equipment really does not matter, whether it is film, M8, M9 or MM - except for it to be second nature to you in operation. They all seem to carry the same signature, have a similar impact and look pretty much the same on my calibrated monitor! Cheers Jayanand On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Lluis Ripoll < lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X, > Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan : > > Carrer del Correu Vell > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html > > > > The Light Way > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html > > > > Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted: > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html > > > > All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning > applied to all. > > In my opinion I can?t say any better quality on film vs MM, except the > grain of course, I?ve don?t put it on the MM version, I consider it is > artificial. What do you think? > > Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >