Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Enough of a percentage for Leica to take it seriously, apparently. Yes, I would consider a used Fuji of that age since the price would be in the hundreds. A used M9 is still in the thousands. That makes a difference. Cheers, Nathan On 12 Dec 2014, at 05:31, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > It looks to be a very small percentage affected, but not a certain > period/batch. Of course the M9 will have been out +5.5 years by then, > would you ever consider buying a Fuji/Sony of that age ;-) > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > However, this does scupper my plan to upgrade my M8 to an M9 during 2015. > Prices have now fallen to my level, but this sensor issue does give me > second thoughts about buying a used M9, and a new M anything costs more > than I am prepared to spend. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > On 11 Dec 2014, at 23:58, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > >> At least Leica is now replacing the >> sensor at no charge no matter how old the camera is and I'll bet they >> come up with a permanent fix soon. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Blog: http://www.nathansmusings.eu/