Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My kind of lens testing :-) But I cannot really tell the lenses apart based on a web image. Also, since you shot them on different days, the conditions (light etc.) were similar but not identical, so you cannot really call it a test. But who cares? The images are nice :-) I have the collapsible Summicron too, and I am very pleased with it. Un abrazo, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator YNWA On 07 Dec 2014, at 01:12, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > In different days in the same place, aperture was 2.8 in all cases (except > the second picture the EIXIF indicates 2.4), with Leica MM > > Also same photographer and same film?.he?he.. > > The two first are with Summicron Collapsible > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001505LR5.jpg.html> > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141204_L1001506LR5.jpg.html> > > The two second with the Summicron Rigid > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000188LR5.jpg.html> > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141030_L1000189LR5.jpg.html> > > I want repeat the test, doing it the same day and same processing, but in > my opinion the renditions are different, the collapsible gives more > Contrast and the Rigid more smoothness and grey tones. > > Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >