Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Was not referring to you Richard but the guy with the website who did the writing on the thing. On 11/3/14 7:18 PM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> wrote: > Jeeze, Mark, take a deep breath will you and re-read my note. It was a > ancient 12MP D300 that went not a D800. As I get older I don?t what to lug > all that weight around so I didn?t wasn?t to upgrade my Nikon stuff. > > 16MP is enough for what I want to do regardless of sensor size so I?m > mostly > shooting with an Oly EM-1 these days and pulled my old micro 4/3rds lenses > out > of the closet to use on it. Two of them are PanaLeicas?s. Great stuff. > > ? though I must say a yearning for one of the Sony A7?s persists and one > may > end up in my hands one of these days. > > You have your needs, I have mine. Mustn?t confuse the two. If you need a > large sensor hi-res camera, use it. I don?t. > > Best, > > Dick > > > > > On Nov 03, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> Funny but this is a guy who in effect traded his D800 Nikon for a Fuji >> X100s. So its clear he's missing a few links in his grasp of camera >> function. Great with typing out caricatures of people based on this non >> grasp of the basics of what certain cameras are all about and what certain >> other aren't. >> >> Why do I need a Nikon D800 full frame 36mp camera when I can just shoot >> with >> a 16 Mp APS-C cropped Fuji pseudo rangefinder listing for $999? >> Because there is little overlap in what these camera are all about. If >> you >> bought and used to of the rez Nikon why would you even look at the Fuji? >> The 800 now 810 is the king of full frame cameras when you need the >> highest >> resolution and tonal range possible. >> The fuji is when quality is not so much the issue as you are shooting a >> cropped camera which is all about compactness and low price point and >> trying >> to pass itself off as a bargain basement Leica. >> >> >> On 11/1/14 10:23 AM, "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Amen! Very funny, very on the mark. But? I just sold my X Pro-1 and >>> all >>> it?s lenses because all the new lenses Fuji has announced will be >>> physically >>> large.* More and more, I find, I want to carry less and less when I >>> photograph. I kept my X100s, though? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Dick >>> >>> *My D300 and it?s two big zooms went months ago, too. >>> >>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> He got it in one... >>>> >>>> Jay (who has a X100T pre-ordered.) >>>> >>>> On 10/31/2014 5:54 PM, Robert Adler wrote: >>>>> A camera walks into a bar: >>>>> http://www.tomen.de/fuji-x100s-review-a-camera-walks-into-a-bar-zack-arias>>>>> / >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photographer >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/