[Leica] High Res M9 Portrait (how sharp is sharp enough?)

[tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)]

Hi Geoff,
I don't re-call you shooting me in such a high class manner? 

My goodness one of the better if not the best portrait type photo of me in
about 40-50 years. :-) Damn yer good lad! I'll consider hiring you for my
90th BD portrait 2018? 2019? :-)

cheers,
ted :-)





-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of
Geoff Hopkinson
Sent: October-22-14 2:18 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] High Res M9 Portrait (how sharp is sharp enough?)

Always entertaining, Kyle. I must be doing it all wrong so very often.

And the ultimate heresy, Dr T in colour and at f/5.6. Forgive me.
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/144872730


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman

On 23 October 2014 07:00, kyle cassidy on the LUG <leicaslacker at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> In reading lens reviews I'll often see something like "this portrait lens
> really starts to shine at f5.6" and I think "f5.6? who in their right mind
> would ever stop down to f5.6 with a portrait lens? Open it up all the way
> and solder down the aperture ring." But then occasionally I think "eek, my
> DOF is a little narrow there" and I resign myself to the possibility that,
> occasionally, f4 is warranted if you want to get both the lion and the
> gazelle in focus.
>
> Not that I'll likely ever do it, but I'll accept it may be true.
>
> Here's a high res portrait that may or may not be sharp enough.
>
> http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2014/stars-flower-high-res.jpg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4181/8435 - Release Date: 10/22/14