Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] In the Woods
From: dennis.leicam6 at gmail.com (Dennis Kushner)
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:41:10 -0400
References: <8D1360310BBAEF0-2908-1B777@webmail-m240.sysops.aol.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6B58ECC@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <5366FA1B.9030401@lighttube.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6B594D8@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

One technical advantage of Olympus 4/3rd's lens is that the
exit rays of the lens perpendicular to the sensor. Not sure
if this was carried on to their M4/3 lenses.

I still use my original E-330  7.5 MP with 50/2 Macro & dust
reduction still working since 2006. AFAIK, it was the first to use
CMOS sensor with live view & dust reduction. About 3 months
after E-330 released, many others introduced live view. Only
shortcoming was 400 ISO but could be boosted higher but I
never tried it above that. Dust reduction was the biggest selling
point for me along with the 50/2 Macro.


On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:43 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> I still have a 6MP Nikon D-100 with 2 lenses for such purposes, looks OK
> on importing in LR but moving to pixel size does not change that much ;-)
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> I agree, John.  The E-1 provides good color for sharing on-line, but
> runs out of steam if severe cropping or large prints are required.  But,
> the lens and camera, valued at around $300 US, is a fine grab and go
> setup that doesn't require a lot of thought about risk. :-)
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 5/4/2014 8:40 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> > 5.5MP is higher resolution than a 27" screen (less than 3.7MP). However
> if you want to print to A3 or larger (and less so at smaller sizes) you
> will see the difference between 5.5MP and 24MP.....
> >
> > john
> > ________________________________________
> >
> >
> > An excellent picture, Jim. As I recall the Olympus E-1 has a 4/3 sensor
> > with only 5.5 megapixel resolution yet on my Apple 27" monitor it came
> > up and clear and sharp as any Leica picture on the Lug. With results
> > like your's, who needs a Leica M? Perhaps Leica was a bit short sighted
> > in abandoning the 4/3 or micro 4/3 format. I have heard much praise for
> > the picture quality of Olympus and Panasonic 4/3 format cameras. But
> > then, of course, Leica would have to compete with cameras costing only
> > a fraction of the price of a Leica T.
> > Larry Z
> > - - -
> > I spotted this Iris this afternoon.
> >
> > http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Iris+in+the+Woods.jpg.html
> >
> > Olympus E-1 with Olympus 35mm Macro
> >
> > Comments and critiques welcomed.
> >
> > --
> > Jim Nichols
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] In the Woods)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] In the Woods)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] In the Woods)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] In the Woods)