Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica T
From: pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:28:22 +0100
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E6B01322@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <535957D0.9050202@summaventures.com> <EF837FDF-98A6-439D-980C-AE35A56A2676@btinternet.com>

Frank,

that was exactly what I assumed. I would have thought that Leica ought to 
have
been capable of doing that in-house. Just another pointless out-cost.

Peter

On 25/04/2014 11:30, Frank Dernie wrote:
> Peter,
> I think very often nowadays when people write "design" they are usually 
> referring to the styling.
> I would imagine the camera was entirely designed by Leica with just the 
> styling done by Audi "design".
> FD
> 
> On 24 Apr, 2014, at 19:28, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> wrote:
> 
>> I would love to understand the real reasons for Leica going to Audi for 
>> the
>> design. They make good cars, but aren't exactly renowned for their 
>> cameras. I
>> suppose it was just a prestige thing to bump up the price.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 

===========================================================
Dr Peter Dzwig                          



In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica T)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Leica T)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Leica T)