Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 18:35:12 -0400

When I started my studio I got a loan and got a Hasselblad ELM with a 150
Sonnar lens. A Gitzo tripod and some Balcar strobes..

Before that I was doing well shooting  everything with a 105 Nikkor on an FM
with an MD-12 winder. It seems obvious the ELM with 150 would be the medium
format version of that. It turned out to have complications.
I never used a normal or wide on my seamless backdrops. Never ever.
A short telephoto was really all I needed.  And some less short.

But for a few years though shooting some fashion and other stuff on location
what was often needed was a normal. And for that I used my 80mm Zeiss Planar
which was permanently  built into my Rolleiflex.

After a few years another loan came along and I got my 80mm Zeiss Planar CF
for my Hassy. And a 50 Distagon.
So I was a complete photog at last.

A lot you can do with one lens though.

A lot of work done in the 60's and 50's and before by pro photogs showing up
with a Rolleiflex with its one built in lens or a speed graphic with one
lens. The idea that you needed other lenes I think was not central to
serious shooting. They were almost thought of as  "extras".
But older photogs will know better.


On 4/13/14 5:34 PM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:

> George that echoes my own reaction ;-) Tortured by thoughts that my
> complete M outfit liquidated might fund a body and one lens....maybe. But
> then I wouldn't have a camera that does everything else that the M does so
> well. First world problem!
> My intent posting the sample of course was to say never mind the maths,
> this is what the best Leica system can DO. Also managing to not transgress
> in this thread and expose myself to the master's wrath ;-)
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 13 April 2014 23:15, George Lottermoser <george.imagist at 
> icloud.com>wrote:
> 
>> What's to be said?
>> I viewed both.
>> And thought, "fantastic resolution. great dynamic range. I WANT A LEICA S.
>> what crimes could I get away with? should I sell the house? buy an S? and
>> live out of a van? so many possibilities."
>> 
>> a note off the iPad, George
>> 
>> On Apr 13, 2014, at 3:04 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ditto mine ;-)
>>> 
>>> john
>>> ________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> i went for the practical contribution on this by posting part of a file
>>> from the S.  The reaction was deafening ;-)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)