Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:13:25 -0500
References: <355831134.2319061396741983627.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12>
 
That could be because you avoid the corners when you use it on the M8. :-)

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 4/5/2014 6:53 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
> Actually I find my pre-asph 35 Summilux performs better on my M8 than on 
> my M6TTL, and it is not coded.
>
> Gene
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pablo Kolodny" <pkolodny1 at icloud.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 6:36:48 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
>
> John,
>
> could you please extend on that ?
>
> Pablo
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2014, at 8:36 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>
>> My 35mm Summilux pre-asph (coded as a Summicron) and f1 Noctilux give 
>> very different looks between coded and uncoded...
>>
>> john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
 In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)