Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 09:11:48 +0930
References: <7CD3D193-C3E2-4953-9D6C-02FCEB36744B@icloud.com> <097401cf5126$41150f20$c33f2d60$@verizon.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E69CDFA9@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <097b01cf5127$d7d9bfe0$878d3fa0$@verizon.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9E69CE1F0@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

I noticed the same thing with the f1 Nocti.

Marty

On Sunday, 6 April 2014, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> Reduced vignetting on Noctilux (but still significant!)  and notable
> colour changes on the 35mm
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> There was always some confusion around the 35mm changes.... I believe
> John...
>
> 35 and below has image changes, 50 and over has no changes.
>
> What kind of changes??  I forget.....if I ever knew....
>
> Remember, the manual entry of lens choice will make ANY lens act as if
> coded.....then you must change the choice every time you change the lens...
>
> So to code or not to code depends on your personal way of photographing....
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net <javascript:;>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> My 35mm Summilux pre-asph (coded as a Summicron) and f1 Noctilux give very
> different looks between coded and uncoded...
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Simple... the camera does no changes to the image from 35mm and up.  28
> and below, and the camera applies some image corrections, depending on the
> lens.
>
> Otherwise, the only difference is that without the coding, the camera can
> not place any info in the EXIF file about the lens being used.
>
> All of this is irrelevant if you wish to tell the camera which lens is
> mounted (manual lens input through the LCD and Menu) .. and then it all
> works as if the lens were coded....
>
> Look at the back of your lens... if there are 5 or 6 screw heads on the
> lens flange, it probably can be coded by changing out the flange.  ($20 or
> so from EBay) You may require re-collimation if the lens does not focus
> correctly... DAG charges about $125 for collimation.....  Leica, if you
> decide to go that route, charges $300 or more to do the entire job,.....
>
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net <javascript:;>
>
> Subject: [Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question
>
> As many good fellows suggested the big M body will be the way to go.
> Now, how do non coded lenses behave in such a body ?
> Will, on the other side, non coded lenses be able to get coded by someone,
> who does that?
> Thanks and regards
> Pablo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from pkolodny1 at icloud.com (Pablo Kolodny) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Coded or non coded lenses, that is the question)