Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leila's April 24th announcement - place your bets!
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:31:14 -0600
References: <CF40D071.196DC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <E0C92447-3E87-4B39-AE4B-B2E560F8DCE2@gmail.com>

In order to appeal to most shooters willing to plunk down that kind of 
money, I think that the normal lens would have to be at least f/2.0. Leica?s 
last film-bade P&S was more like a 40/2.4 Summarit.

One of the big advantages Zeiss has over Leica is that their comparable 
optics (50/2  or 35/2) are orders of magnitude apart in cost.

Jeffery


On Mar 8, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Jim Laurel (gmail) <jplaurel at gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems like a good idea would be to come up with a trio of compacts 
> along the lines of the RX-1. Full frame, and each with a separate fixed 
> focal length lens. Say, a 21, 35 and 50mm. Sell them for around $3k each. 
> Sensor dust would be a thing of the past. We usually carry at least 2 
> bodies anyway.
> 
> 
> On Mar 8, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> Well if they did really do a direct confrontation on the full frame 
>> compact
>> Sony RX1  they'd be doing a camera which has a build in lens and not
>> interechangble ones which would be a bit of a gem. Hence less of a market
>> grabber from the M with interchangeable cash register dings.
>> The Sony has a fixed Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm F2 which certainly 
>> dominates
>> the camera as it appears a bit too big for it; really ruining its
>> pocketablility.. But with quality to make it worth it.
>> Leica would likely not make the mistake of ruining the pocketability with 
>> an
>> oversize lens. It would make a 35 Summicron of a much more compact design.
>> If they asked me I'd tell them to give the Rollei 35 a nod with a
>> collapsible 40 Elmar. Also a Barnack basic design element.
>> If they were super smart they'd make the thing look like a slightly scaled
>> down Barnack; a slightly scaled down very early Leica body.
>> But I can see them wanting to one up Zeiss with a Summilux 1.4. They can 
>> be
>> just as compact. And there is a long history of Leitz - Zeiss speed one
>> upping. I'd tell them to put a 3.5 Elmar on it and make it all about
>> pocketability as its full frame it could be shot at 64,000 easy so 
>> optical;
>> speed really is not such a big deal. Weight and size is.
>> 
>> A digital Leica Standard (1933) would outclass everything and everybody.
>> They'd all just have to go home. And sulk.
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/14 11:33 PM, "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> "Eyes are 0n Leica now to come out with its answer to the Sony RX1 full
>>> frame
>>> compact. Not stupidly dumb itself down."
>>> 
>>> Mark, any idea of which lens they would use for something like this? 
>>> Leica
>>> glass is getting insanely pricey, but would they dare using a 
>>> Japanese-made
>>> "Leica" lens?
>>> 
>>> Jeffery
>>> 
>>> On Friday, March 7, 2014, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> "bringing Leica back to the 4/3." kinda sounds like Leica used to make a
>>>> 4/3's camera, and now its coming back home.. Not the case. It's made a
>>>> couple of 4/3's lenes for other companies cameras.
>>>> Leica now is making compact 1.5 crop cameras. If there is a reason why 
>>>> it
>>>> should go 4/3's as if its a fad it has a prerogative to join in on I'd 
>>>> like
>>>> to know what it is. As is its a company whose mission has always been
>>>> making
>>>> a quality product and senselessly cutting its compact format in half 
>>>> does
>>>> not add up.
>>>> Eyes are 0n Leica now to come out with its answer to the Sony RX1 full
>>>> frame
>>>> compact. Not stupidly dumb itself down.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/6/14 3:06 PM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com 
>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Wanna bet Ken ;-) ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Geoff
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 7 March 2014 05:58, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.com <javascript:;>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> My guess is that it will be a cosmetically enhanced version of the
>>>>>> Panasonic DMC-GX7, at $500 more, bringing Leica back to the 4/3.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Jim Laurel (gmail)
>>>>>> <jplaurel at gmail.com<javascript:;>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just for fun, who would like to speculate on what Leica will announce
>>>> on
>>>>>>> April 24? Will it be the fabled Leica T (typ 701)?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If I had a seat at the conference table, here's what I would I would
>>>>>>> propose:
>>>>>>> -- A modified M mount that supports autofocus. The "Leica M-AF" 
>>>>>>> mount.
>>>>>>> -- Re-tool X-Vario to accept these new lenses. This APS-C camera will
>>>> be
>>>>>>> the initial offering. This new camera body can read the 6-bit coding 
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> current M mount lenses.
>>>>>>> -- Release a set of primes with moderate aperture but superlative IQ 
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> classical focal length equivalents: 35, 50, 28 and 90mm, in that 
>>>>>>> order.
>>>>>>> M-AF lenses actually project an image circle sufficient for APS-H.
>>>>>>> -- Customers who want wider, longer or faster can use traditional M
>>>> mount
>>>>>>> lenses
>>>>>>> -- Firmware update for M240 to use the new lenses in crop mode.
>>>>>>> -- Next cycle, release the APS-H body with integrated EVF in the
>>>>>>> traditional position (far left)
>>>>>>> -- Sell body and prime of your choice as a kit. Your choice of an 
>>>>>>> M-AF
>>>>>>> prime for the same price. M-AF body and one prime priced between M240
>>>>>>> (body) and X-Vario.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Jim
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ken Iisaka
>>>>>> first name at last name dot org or com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> Photographer
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel) ([Leica] Leila's April 24th announcement - place your bets!)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leila's April 24th announcement - place your bets!)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leila's April 24th announcement - place your bets!)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel (gmail)) ([Leica] Leila's April 24th announcement - place your bets!)