Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The M(240) is much quieter than the M9 john ________________________________________ I don't have a 240, to compare. <snip> It is substantially louder than my M9, By the way, welcome back, Jim. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Lucien <lucien_vd at mac.com> wrote: > And it is noisy. > > Much more noisy than the M240. > > Lucien > > > On 20 f?vr. 2014, at 19:39, Jim Gmail <jplaurel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Aren't there a lot if reported issues with adapted lenses? The Leica M > primes, at least, seem to perform much better on the M240 than on the A7. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Feb 20, 2014, at 15:38, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Except that it will fit nearly every 35mm lens in the book, LTM, M, and > R, > >> as well as the native ones. and the 35 2.8 T* is not too big, larger > than > >> a sumicron. > >> > >> The 55 and 35 may not be crazy interesting, but taken as a package with > the > >> camera, they are pretty sweet. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jim Laurel (gmail) <jplaurel at > >> gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> I wish someone could explain all the hype around the Sony A7 twins. > Ok, I > >>> get that it's a full frame mirrorless and that puts it in an exclusive > club > >>> with just two members, alongside the M240. I understand everyone's > desire > >>> for a full frame platform for mounting legacy glass. But as a system > in its > >>> own right, I don't get it. Sure, the body is small, but so what? Lenses > >>> that produce an image circle suitable for a full frame sensor are > going to > >>> be just as large as, say, the Canon system. At the end of the day, > your bag > >>> is going to weigh nearly as much as any other full frame system. You're > >>> only saving a ounces on the body. And that assumes that there are > >>> interesting native mount lenses for the A7, which there aren't...not > yet, > >>> anyway... > >>> > >>> --Jim > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I came into the photo game after they put in the click stops so I > hadn't > >>>> done much shooting at f 2.7 or f9 or 101st of a second.! > >>>> Things were pretty much rounded off for me! I'd have a had a hard time > >>>> getting my head around f9. Did it exist? > >>>> When the A & P settings got put in camera bodies in I think the > early > >>> 80's > >>>> I did use these and any odd settings as that's what the A settings on > my > >>>> cameras gave me. Though you could not see it in any metadata you > could > >>>> remember they were there!! > >>>> In a way of thinking it was an added level of precision which I > thought > >>> was > >>>> pretty cool! Of a sky needed 101st of a second that's what it got! > >>>> Not some measly 100th just so the thing would go click! > >>>> > >>>> Is a one percent level of precision something I should NOT be worried > >>> about? > >>>> Sure! But I'll take it if they're handing it to me. And all those 1% > >>> levels > >>>> of precision on the myriad areas of camerawork add up I should think. > >>>> > >>>> The major thing about auto settings is really about loosing less > shots as > >>>> you've got your eye more on the subject than needle or led's or > controll > >>>> knobs. Your not constantly trying to maintain your exposure you just > know > >>>> its there! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Mark William Rabiner > >>>> Photographer > >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> > >> Sonny > >> http://sonc.com/look/ > >> Natchitoches, Louisiana > >> 1714 > >> Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase > >> > >> USA > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Regards, Sonny http://sonc.com/look/ Natchitoches, Louisiana 1714 Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase USA _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more informationN??zf????r????_??)jf?????j??v+b?z? W????8^~?????y??????????m??????????i??????b??jz???????bq?????"????i????X?z{???i????+)jf??ej{\?o?nr??rW??f????u?a?i