Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:14:18 +0100
References: <5498B81A-FBC7-4DCC-805C-D7F940A2394B@gmail.com>

Hard to tell the difference. I think I like the MM version of the 
caste?uelas seller best, but the M9 version of the couple. Based on this 
evidence, I would certainly not buy the MM. 

Un abrazo,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Jan 27, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:

> The casta?uelas seller
> 
> Leica M9, Lux 75
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1038519.jpg.html>
> 
> the previous one posted with the MM was this one:
> 
> MM Lux 75
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1000827LR5w.jpg.html>
> 
> 
> The Young Couple
> 
> Leica M9, Lux 75
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1038523.jpg.html>
> 
> the previous one with the MM and Summilux 35
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140123_L1000863.jpg.html>
> 
> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing B&W M9/MM)