Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan last set
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:41:28 +0100
References: <AB248732-1406-41BA-B0BE-0D755AD71A97@gmail.com> <52DF2AA2.3030509@lighttube.net> <9FBAE4E8-6A31-47CB-8A71-4CE9F4A278DE@frozenlight.eu> <CAE3QcF4rx9CaNFxD0a3pA-Cd3JLDXR-v7Bx1S1MzkYsfY8xC4g@mail.gmail.com>

That's really weird! Thanks anyway :-)

Brian, any idea why this behavior takes place? After all, my OWN posts make 
it to the list fine, it is when people reply to them on-list that the 
problem occurs. Truly weird. 

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Jan 22, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> I posted two comments to the LUG Nathan recommending your e-book I bought a
> little while ago. The LUG server bounced them as SPAM!
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> On 22 January 2014 15:47, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
> 
>> Jim, these were posts to the LUG or to me? I assume to the LUG, but then I
>> don't understand why you and Lluis had problems while other responses did
>> appear on the list. The mysteries of e-mail ;-)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 3:19 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> 
>>> Lluis,
>>> 
>>> I had two of my responses to Nathan's postings returned last night, and
>> I have made no change in my email address.  It has not happened with mail
>> to anyone else.  There is something in Nathan's post that is being
>> considered spam.
>>> 
>>> You might try deleting his post when sending the response.
>>> 
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>> 
>>> On 1/21/2014 7:50 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>>>> Nathan,
>>>> 
>>>> I?ve modified my e-mail address and for two times my e-mail was
>> returned, I can?t understand because I?ve verified my sending account
>> before to send it? well, the text is this one:
>>>> 
>>>> Nathan,
>>>> 
>>>> Nice and a great variety of pics here. I like very much the light on
>> the the three first night pics, amazing story of your friend Lars, 3_7 
>> made
>> me smile, 3_10 is wonderful and my favorite, 3_17 a lovely image in a
>> smooth and sweet B&W, and 3_20 a great detail for not forget the history.
>>>> 
>>>> Un abrazo,
>>>> Lluis
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Nathan last set)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Nathan last set)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan last set)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Nathan last set)