Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why? Both are used to take pictures. In 1993 there were no digital Leicas to compare to. Anyway, you can do the same for lenses. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Jan 11, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Doug Herr wrote: > Nathan Wajsman wrote: > >> >> http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm >> >> Since 1993 (i.e. 20 years ago), the CPI in the US has risen about 60%. >> >> So a $7000 Leica M10 would have cost about $4300 in 1993-dollars. I don't >> think the Leica M6 was anywhere near that. >> > > Price comparisons of film and digital cameras fail: apples, oranges. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >