Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Diana (2013)
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 07:01:29 +0000
References: <8D7CC5D5-19B0-415E-9043-D994FCA61B09@gmail.com> <CE9B37AC.130EA%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I am not a royalist, what did you expect to 'find out' from this film?

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> I'm noticing now its getting panned by all the critics. So I don't think 
> it will
> have an adverse effect on photographers and photography.
> I'll be interested to see what kind of audience it generates.
> 
> 
> On 11/2/13 10:50 PM, "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > Steve Barbour
> >
> >> On Nov 2, 2013, at 5:45 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Diana (2013)
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnmX7uksies
> >>
> >> This film just released I've seen the trailer (above) twice.
> >> Its clear the slant the film has on the Lady Di story is its about a
> >> women whose life was plagued by "the camera" and the people who
> used
> >> them. The dreaded P word: Photographers. She'd be alive today if it
> >> wasn't for that and them.
> >
> >
> > sure seems that way, and the film has an actress that doesn't begin to
> > justify all the attention...
> >
> >
> > s
> >
> >
> >
> >> Despicable!!! said Bugs Bunny. Or was it Daffy Duck?!?
> >> Well whoever said it this kind of stuff is as dumb as it gets.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> Photographer
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> >>


In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Diana (2013))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Diana (2013))